Deadly Protests in Nepal Over Social Media Ban Leave 13 Dead, Dozens Injured
Kathmandu, Nepal – At least 13 people have been killed and dozens more injured after violent clashes erupted in Nepal during mass protests against the government’s decision to ban popular social media platforms, including Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and Instagram.
Thousands of demonstrators, many of them identifying as Generation Z activists, gathered outside Nepal’s parliament building in Kathmandu on Monday, denouncing what they called the government’s “authoritarian crackdown” on digital freedom.
Government Defends Ban as “Regulation”
Nepal’s Minister for Communication, Prithvi Subba, told the BBC that security forces were forced to use water cannons, batons, tear gas, and rubber bullets after protesters breached restricted zones near the parliament.
The government has defended its move, claiming the restrictions are aimed at curbing fake news, online scams, and hate speech. However, critics argue the ban undermines free speech, pointing out that millions of Nepalis rely on social media for news, entertainment, and small business opportunities.
Protesters Demand Change
Marchers carried banners reading “Enough is Enough” and “End Corruption”, calling for the government to reverse its decision. Some protesters managed to climb over security walls, intensifying the confrontation with police.
Police spokesperson Shekhar Khanal confirmed that force was used after demonstrators entered restricted areas. Authorities later imposed a curfew around parliament and other key districts in Kathmandu to contain further unrest.
Social Media Crackdown Sparks Backlash
The ban comes after authorities ordered 26 platforms to register with Nepal’s Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. Two platforms have since complied and been restored, but access to others remains blocked. Many Nepalis are turning to VPNs to bypass restrictions.
The government insists this is not a “ban” but rather an effort to ensure platforms follow Nepali law. Still, rights groups and protesters warn it represents a major step toward censorship.
This is a developing story. Updates will follow as more details emerge.